Key result
3D-T1rho mapping with parallel imaging shows good reproducibility with a maximum CV of ~4%.
Why the study?
3D-T1rho mapping with parallel imaging at 3.0T was implemented to assess reproducibility and reduce acquisition time and RF energy deposition in knee joint imaging.
3D-T1rho mapping with parallel imaging at 3.0T provides reproducible measurements of the knee joint while potentially reducing acquisition time and RF energy deposition.
3D-T1rho mapping is technically feasible at 3T; leaves open validation for cardiac tissue characterization.
Three-dimensional spin-lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (3D-T1rho) with parallel imaging at 3.0T was implemented on a whole-body clinical scanner. A 3D gradient-echo sequence with a self-compensating spin-lock pulse cluster was combined with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) to acquire T1rho-weighted images. 3D-T1rho maps of an agarose phantom and three healthy subjects were constructed using an eight-channel phased-array coil without parallel imaging and with parallel imaging acceleration factors of 2 and 3, in order to assess the reproducibility of the method. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the median T1rho of the agarose phantom was 0.44%, which shows excellent reproducibility. The reproducibility of in vivo 3D-T1rho maps was also investigated in three healthy subjects. The CV of the median T1rho of the patellar cartilage varied between approximately 1.1% and 4.3%. Similarly, the CV varied between approximately 2.1-5.8%, approximately 1.4-8.7%, and approximately 1.5-4.1% for the biceps femoris and lateral and medial gastrocnemius muscles, respectively. The preliminary results demonstrate that 3D-T1rho maps can be constructed with good reproducibility using parallel imaging. 3D-T1rho with parallel imaging capability is an important clinical tool for reducing both the total acquisition time and RF energy deposition at 3T.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pakin et al. (2006) studied this question. 3D-T1rho mapping with parallel imaging vs. 3D-T1rho mapping without parallel imaging was evaluated on Coefficient of variation (CV) of the median T1rho. 3D-T1rho mapping with parallel imaging demonstrated good reproducibility in healthy subjects, with the coefficient of variation of the patellar cartilage varying between 1.1% and 4.3%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: