This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Huge political, ideological and organisational changes are engulfing primary care, placing intense pressures on the sense of self for both patient and doctor within the consultation. A recent Health Foundation report urges us to develop care practices rooted in a philosophy of people as ‘purposeful, thinking, feeling, emotional, reflective, relational, responsive beings’.1 GPs are encouraged to work collaboratively with patients, fostering shared decision-making and promoting self-management. This assumes that patients (and doctors) have agency and capacity, the ability to make their own choices and decisions and the power to take action in a given situation. But these assumptions are problematic when you are running 15 minutes late during a morning surgery with 18 patients, most of whom are unknown to you, and your QOF screen pop-up urges you to update the patient’s CVD risk assessment score and take action to reduce their HbA1c levels. We wish to give clinicians ‘permission’ to do person-centred care by offering a language of self that they can use to describe and defend their practice. Our principal motivations in establishing the centrality of the self in primary care are to offer hope to those entering the field, encourage those jaded by their current experience in practice, and provide vital underpinning to the generalist cause.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dowrick et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: