Key result
PEAK Plasmablade cuts blood loss and operative time versus standard electrocautery in adolescent scoliosis surgery.
Why the study?
The effectiveness of PEAK Plasmablade compared with bipolar sealer and standard electrocautery in reducing blood loss during PSF surgery for AIS was not established.
Does PEAK Plasmablade reduce intraoperative blood loss and operative time compared to standard electrocautery in patients undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
RCT (n=93)
randomized
Does PEAK Plasmablade reduce intraoperative blood loss and operative time compared to standard electrocautery in patients undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
p-value: p=.001
The use of PEAK Plasmablade in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss and operative time, potentially facilitating faster recovery.
Reduces blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay in AIS fusion; supports plasma technology adoption in posterior spinal deformity surgery.
Study Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of PEAK Plasmablade (PPB), compared with bipolar sealer and standard electrocautery, in the posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSF) surgery performed for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: Ninety-three patients undergoing PSF surgery for AIS were randomized in 2 groups: group-A patients (n = 45) underwent PSF surgery using PPB; group-B patients (n = 48) were treated with bipolar sealer and standard electrocautery. Demographic and surgical data was recorded. All the patients underwent serial blood tests on the day before surgery (T0) and at 24 (T1), 48 (T2), 72 (T3), and 96 (T4) hours postoperatively. Visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) score, the percentage of paracetamol assumption, and the blood transfusion rate were recorded in the time-lapse T1 to T4. Intergroup variability was assessed. Pearson correlation test was performed. A P value <.05 was considered significant. Results: In group A, a significantly shorter total operative time ( P = .0087), a significantly lower total intraoperative blood loss (TBL) ( P = .001), and a higher postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) ( P = .01) were recorded. A significant higher mean Hb concentration and mean albumin value was recorded in group A at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. A significant correlation between TBL and hospital stay was recorded in both groups (group A, P = .00 001; group B, P = .00 006); moreover, in both groups, a significant correlation was observed between TBL and mean VAS at 72 hours postoperatively (group A, P = .0009; group B, P = .0001) and at 96 hours postoperatively (group A, P = .000 044; group B, P = .00 001). Conclusions: PPB reduces the intraoperative blood loss in PSF performed for AIS, thus allowing a patient’s faster recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piazzolla et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (n=93). PEAK Plasmablade (PPB) vs. bipolar sealer and standard electrocautery was evaluated on total intraoperative blood loss (TBL) (p=.001). PEAK Plasmablade significantly reduced total intraoperative blood loss (P=0.001) and total operative time (P=0.0087) compared to standard electrocautery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: