Key result
E-health telemonitoring cuts HF admissions by up to ~36% and reduces mortality vs usual care.
Why the study?
Despite promising results of E-health in improving clinical outcomes in heart failure patients, its implementation remains low internationally.
Does home-based E-health technology reduce HF-related hospital admissions and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure compared to usual care?
Does home-based E-health technology reduce HF-related hospital admissions and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure compared to usual care?
Effect estimate: RR 0.64-0.86
E-health technologies, such as telemonitoring, have shown promise in improving clinical outcomes like hospital admissions and mortality in heart failure patients, though international implementation remains low.
Lower eHealth literacy may constrain digital tool use post-PCI; leaves open whether targeted education improves engagement and outcomes.
The term E-health, or information and communication technology, has been introduced during the last decade and is currently an evolving topic. The term refers to techno-logy that supports health care providers in the management of chronic diseases and continuing care. The World Health Organization defines E-health as ‘the transfer of health resources and health care by electronic means’.1 According to this definition, it is a method of using health resources more appropriately and efficiently. Significant examples in terms of home telemonitoring can be found in the management of patients with heart failure (HF); a positive impact on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with HF2 and their admission to hospital3 has been demonstrated. A recent summary of systematic reviews has shown improved clinical outcomes in patients with HF using home-based E-health technology.4 The technology investigated included video consultations, mobile telemonitoring, telemonitoring based on automated devices and web-based telemonitoring. E-health (device-based telemonitoring and mobile telemonitoring) proved to be effective in reducing the relative risk of HF-related admission to hospital (from a relative risk of 0.64 to 0.86) compared with usual care (absolute risk from 3.7 to 8.2%) and the relative risk of all-cause mortality (from 0.60 to 0.85) and absolute risk from 1.4 to 6.5% compared with usual care.4 These results are strongly dependent on the type of technology and the patient population and hence care should be taken in ge-neralizing these E-health effects.5 Despite these promising results however, the implementation of E-health tools in the care of patients with HF is low internationally.6
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hendriks et al. (2015) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and Heart failure. E-health technology (device-based and mobile telemonitoring) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Heart failure-related admission to hospital (RR 0.64-0.86). E-health telemonitoring reduced the relative risk of heart failure-related hospital admissions (RR 0.64-0.86) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.60-0.85) compared with usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: