Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, we review (1) statistical tests of DNA phylogenies inferred by the maximum- parsimony method, including tests that take into account the effect of different base compositions among lineages, (2) statistical tests based on the minimum-evolution criterion, i.e., the best tree is the tree with the smallest sum of branch-length estimates, and (3) the bootstrap technique for estimating the confidence level of a phylogenetic hypothesis based on either the maximum-parsimony or the neighbor-joining method. We explain why the bootstrap technique usually gives biased estimates and how to correct the bias. (DNA phylogenies; parsimony; neighbor joining; minimum evolution; statis? tical tests; bootstrap; bias correction.)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: