Key result
Elevated vWF is linked to ~199% higher risk of incident ACS but not stable angina.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether novel inflammatory and haemostatic biomarkers are more predictive of incident acute coronary syndrome than stable angina in asymptomatic middle-aged men.
Are novel inflammatory and haemostatic biomarkers more predictive of incident acute coronary syndrome than stable angina in asymptomatic middle-aged men?
Case-Control (n=807)
Yes
Are novel inflammatory and haemostatic biomarkers more predictive of incident acute coronary syndrome than stable angina in asymptomatic middle-aged men?
Odds Ratio: 2.99 (95% CI 1.49–6.02)
p-value: p=0.02
Elevated levels of haemostatic markers, particularly von Willebrand factor, are significantly more predictive of incident acute coronary syndrome than stable angina in asymptomatic men.
vWF may differentiate ACS from stable angina risk in asymptomatic men; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
AIMS: To compare whether novel inflammatory and haemostatic biomarkers are more predictive of well-characterized incident acute coronary syndrome (ACS) than stable angina (SA). METHODS AND RESULTS: We used data from the PRIME Study, a prospective cohort of 9758 asymptomatic middle-aged men recruited in Northern Ireland and France between 1991 and 1993. A nested case-control study was established with the baseline plasma sample of 269 incident cases and 538 matched controls. Odds ratios (ORs) for SA and ACS were estimated by conditional logistic regression analysis. After 5 years of follow-up, 107 incident SA and 162 ACS cases were validated. After adjustment for traditional risk factors, higher circulating levels of hs-CRP, ICAM1, interleukin 6 and interleukin 18 were equally predictive of SA and ACS (all P-values of OR comparison >0.05). In contrast, elevated levels of fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, and possibly higher level of D-dimers and lower level of tissue factor pathway inhibitor were associated with ACS only. The comparison of the ORs showed a statistically significant difference for von Willebrand factor only [OR(4th vs. 1st quartile) = 2.99 (1.49-6.02) for ACS vs. 0.80 (0.33-1.94) for SA; P(z test) = 0.02]. CONCLUSION: This is the first population-based study suggesting that higher levels of circulating haemostatic markers and of von Willebrand factor, in particular, are significantly more predictive of incident ACS than SA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Empana et al. (2008) conducted a case-control in incident stable angina and acute coronary syndrome (n=807). Elevated von Willebrand factor and other haemostatic biomarkers vs. Lower levels (1st quartile) was evaluated on Incident acute coronary syndrome (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.49-6.02, p=0.02). Elevated von Willebrand factor was significantly more predictive of incident acute coronary syndrome (OR 2.99; 95% CI 1.49-6.02) than stable angina (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.33-1.94; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: