Key result
Chelation therapy lacks sufficient evidence for routine CVD prevention despite encouraging signals in post-MI diabetics.
Why the study?
The widespread off-label use of chelation therapy for prevention of cardiovascular disease lacks convincing evidence for efficacy and regulatory approval, prompting a need to clarify its role in coronary artery disease patients.
Does chelation therapy (disodium edetate or EDTA) improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Does chelation therapy (disodium edetate or EDTA) improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease?
This review concludes that current evidence does not support the routine use of chelation therapy for cardiovascular disease prevention.
Advises against routine chelation for CVD prevention; leaves open targeted benefit in post-MI diabetes pending larger RCTs.
INTRODUCTION: The off-label use of chelation therapy (disodium edetate or EDTA) for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is widespread, despite the lack of convincing evidence for efficacy or approval from the Food and Drug Administration. After the publication of results from the National Institute of Health-sponsored Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT), a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in patients after myocardial infarction (MI), there is a renewed interest in clarifying the role of this treatment modality for patients with coronary artery disease. Areas covered: This narrative review highlights the evidence from observational studies and RCT in assessing the effect of chelation therapy on cardiovascular outcomes and potential for adverse effects or harm. Expert commentary: Although encouraging results were reported in TACT, the evidence is insufficient to recommend the routine use of chelation therapy even in the post-MI diabetic subgroup, which appeared to benefit. The ongoing TACT2 trial may clarify its use in post-MI diabetic patients. Unsubstantiated claims of chelation therapy as an effective treatment of atherosclerosis should be avoided and patients made aware of the inadequate evidence for efficacy and potential adverse effects, especially the harm that can occur if used as a substitute for proven therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sultan et al. (2017) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Chelation therapy (disodium edetate or EDTA) was evaluated. Current evidence is insufficient to recommend routine use of chelation therapy for cardiovascular disease prevention, despite encouraging results in post-MI diabetic patients from the TACT trial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: