Key result
NOAC use in anticoagulated AF is ~17%, linked to cardiologist care rather than stroke risk.
Why the study?
Data on management of atrial fibrillation in the Balkan Region are scarce, particularly regarding the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.
What are the patterns and predictors of NOAC use in patients with atrial fibrillation in the Balkan region?
Observational (n=2,663)
Yes
What are the patterns and predictors of NOAC use in patients with atrial fibrillation in the Balkan region?
Absolute Event Rate: 17.2% vs 82.8%
NOAC use in the Balkan region is relatively low and appears to be driven by non-evidence-based factors such as drug availability and reimbursement rather than individual stroke and bleeding risk.
NOAC uptake in Balkan AF appears driven by non-risk factors; leaves open whether reimbursement policies explain low adoption versus guideline-directed selection.
INTRODUCTION: Data on management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Balkan Region are scarce. To capture the patterns in AF management in contemporary clinical practice in the Balkan countries a prospective survey was conducted between December 2014 and February 2015, and we report results pertinent to the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). METHODS: A 14-week prospective, multicenter survey of consecutive AF patients seen by cardiologists or internal medicine specialists was conducted in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Montenegro, Romania, and Serbia (a total of about 50 million inhabitants). RESULTS: Of 2712 enrolled patients, 2663 (98.2%) had complete data relevant to oral anticoagulant (OAC) use (mean age 69.1 ± 10.9 years, female 44.6%). Overall, OAC was used in 1960 patients (73.6%) of whom 338 (17.2%) received NOACs. Malignancy [odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.06, 1.20-3.56], rhythm control (OR 1.64, 1.25-2.16), and treatment by cardiologists were independent predictors of NOAC use (OR 2.32, 1.51-3.54) [all p < 0.01)], whilst heart failure and valvular disease were negatively associated with NOAC use (both p < 0.01). Individual stroke and bleeding risk were not significantly associated with NOAC use on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: NOACs are increasingly used in AF patients in the Balkan Region, but NOAC use is predominantly guided by factors other than evidence-based decision-making (e.g., drug availability on the market or reimbursement policy). Efforts are needed to establish an evidence-based approach to OAC selection and to facilitate the optimal use of OAC, thus improving the outcomes in AF patients in this large region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Potpara et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=2,663). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Proportion of OAC-treated patients receiving NOACs. Among atrial fibrillation patients receiving oral anticoagulation in the Balkan region, 17.2% were prescribed NOACs, with use independently predicted by malignancy, rhythm control strategy, and treatment by a cardiologist rather than individual stroke risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: