Key result
Higher educational attainment links to ~28% lower risk of metabolic syndrome in men.
Why the study?
The association between socioeconomic status and metabolic syndrome among the general population in Nanjing, China was investigated to understand related public health implications.
Is higher socioeconomic status associated with a lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=13,287)
Is higher socioeconomic status associated with a lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults?
Odds Ratio: 0.72 (95% CI 0.57–0.92)
p-value: p=0.009
Higher educational attainment and family income are inversely associated with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults.
BackgroundWe aim to investigate the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) among general population in Nanjing, China.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in 2017 among adults aged 18 years or older in Nanjing, China. Participants were selected using multistage sampling approach. Diagnosed MetS was the outcome variable. Education and monthly family average income (FAI) was used to separately indicate SES. Mixed-effects models were used to calculate the association between SES and MetS.ResultsThe prevalence of MetS was 19.7% (95%CI=19.0%, 20.4%) among overall sample population. After controlling for covariates, educational attainment was negatively associated with MetS prevalence in women. As for men, the most well-educated subjects were at the lowest risk (OR=0.72, 95%CI=0.57, 0.92) of having MetS compared to the least educated subjects. Relative to those who from lower FAI sub-group, participants from upper tertile were less likely to have MetS for both genders (OR=0.73, 95%CI=0.617, 0.87; OR=0.85, 95%CI=0.73, 0.99). Among all participants, higher education level predicted lower waist circumference, triglycerides, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and fasting glucose concentration. Higher FAI was associated with lower waist circumference and systolic and diastolic blood pressure in women, and with lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure in men.ConclusionsEducation and family average income each was inversely related to MetS and its components prevalence in Nanjing, China in 2017. It has important public health implications that the tailored prevention strategies should be implemented for people with different socioeconomic status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome (n=13,287). Higher socioeconomic status (education and family average income) vs. Lower socioeconomic status was evaluated on Prevalence of metabolic syndrome (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.92, p=0.009). Higher educational attainment was associated with a significantly lower risk of metabolic syndrome in men (OR 0.72) compared to the least educated subjects, with similar inverse associations observed for family income.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: