Key result
First-twin vaginal operative delivery linked to ~208% higher second-twin asphyxia-related mortality vs normal delivery.
Why the study?
The impacts of operative delivery for the first twin with vertex presentation on neonatal outcomes in the second twin were not well characterized.
Does operative delivery for the first twin affect neonatal outcomes in the second twin?
Cohort (n=102,554)
Yes
Does operative delivery for the first twin affect neonatal outcomes in the second twin?
Odds Ratio: 3.08 (95% CI 1.07–8.45)
Vaginal operative delivery for the first twin is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes in the second twin, whereas cesarean delivery for the first twin is associated with beneficial outcomes for the second twin.
May warrant caution with operative vaginal delivery for the first twin; leaves open optimal twin delivery strategies.
We assess the impacts of operative delivery for the first twins with vertex presentation on neonatal outcomes in second twins using the 1995 to 1997 twin registry data of the United States. A total of 102,554 eligible twin pairs with vertex presentation for the first twin were included in the analysis. Of these, 50,748 (49.5%) first twins had a normal vaginal delivery, 43,504 (42.4%) were delivered by cesarean section, and 8302 (8.1%) were delivered by vaginal operation (vacuum extraction or forceps). In term twins, the risks of asphyxia-related mortality (odds ratio [OR], 3.08; 95% CI, 1.07 to 8.45), newborn injury (OR, 2.10; 95% 1.39 to 3.12), low Apgar score at 5 minutes (OR, 1.49; 95% 1.24 to 1.78), and mechanical ventilation use (OR, 1.34; 95% 1.20 to 1.51) were increased in the second twins whose co-twins were delivered by vaginal operation compared with those whose co-twins who had normal vaginal delivery. In contrast, the risks of asphyxia-related mortality (OR, 0.55; 95% 0.17 to 1.57), newborn injury (OR, 0.20; 95% 0.11 to 0.34), low Apgar score at 5 minutes (OR, 0.51; 95% 0.44 to 0.60), and mechanical ventilation use (OR, 0.77; 95% 0.71 to 0.83) were decreased in the second twins whose co-twins were delivered by cesarean section compared with those whose co-twins had a normal vaginal delivery. In conclusion, vaginal operative delivery for the first twins is related to the adverse neonatal outcomes of their co-twins, whereas cesarean delivery for the first twins is associated with the beneficial neonatal outcomes of their co-twins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2006) conducted a cohort in Twin pregnancy (n=102,554). Vaginal operative delivery for the first twin vs. Normal vaginal delivery for the first twin was evaluated on Asphyxia-related mortality in the second twin (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.07 to 8.45). Vaginal operative delivery for the first twin increased the risk of asphyxia-related mortality in the second twin compared to normal vaginal delivery (OR 3.08; 95% CI 1.07-8.45).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: