Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief Purpose: To determine baseline factors predictive of outcomes 1 year after 3 monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injections followed by as-needed injections for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Methods: A nonrandomized prospective 1-year trial collected data from 144 Japanese patients (144 eyes) with symptomatic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy who received one 0.5-mg intravitreal ranibizumab injection monthly for 3 months followed by as-needed retreatments. Statistical analysis evaluated baseline independent factors predictive of better visual acuity and the need for fewer injections 1 year after the first injection. Results: After the initial 3 monthly injections, a mean ± standard deviation of 1.2 ± 1.1 as-needed injections was administered. The mean visual acuity improved significantly (P < 0.01) from 20/80 to 20/50. Better visual acuity and no history of photodynamic therapy or clusters of grape-like polypoidal lesions were significant independent baseline factors predictive of better visual acuity 1 year after the first injection. No factors were significantly associated with a need for fewer ranibizumab reinjections during follow-up. Conclusion: The baseline clinical characteristics predicted favorable visual acuity outcomes. These findings might be useful to explaining the prognosis of ranibizumab treatment to the patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Summary: Baseline characteristics, such as the visual acuity, history of photodynamic therapy, and presence of a cluster of grape-like polypoidal lesions, are predictive of visual acuity 1 year after 3 monthly ranibizumab injections and as-needed reinjections for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hikichi et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: