Key result
Opportunistic screening detects new AF in ~0.8% of rural adults over 65.
Why the study?
Previous opportunistic AF screening studies were conducted in high population density areas before novel oral anticoagulants were available, leaving feasibility in rural areas uncertain.
Does opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation in a rural area identify new cases in subjects 65 years and older?
Cross-Sectional (n=7,262)
Does opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation in a rural area identify new cases in subjects 65 years and older?
Opportunistic AF screening in a rural environment is feasible and identifies new cases, though at a lower rate than previous studies due to a higher baseline prevalence of known AF.
Opportunistic AF screening may detect new cases in rural elderly; leaves open whether it improves outcomes or merits routine use.
INTRODUCTION: Opportunistic screening is an effective means of identifying subjects with Atrial Fibrillation (AF). Previous studies of opportunistic screening have been performed areas with high population density and before the development of novel oral anticoagulant drugs. We performed a study to determine feasibility of AF screening in a predominantly rural, low population density area. METHODS: Over 6 months, subjects 65 years and older were screened by local General Practitioners using radial pulse palpation confirmed by 12 lead Electrocardiogram. Data were recorded electronically and those with newly identified AF were followed up to examine management post diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 7262 subjects were screened and an irregular pulse was found in 916 (12.6%) of whom 735 (10.1%) had known AF and 55 (0.76%) had newly detected AF. Of these 55 patients with newly documented AF, 28 (50.9%) were women, 38 (69.1%) had hypertension and eight (14.5%) had a smoking history. Mean body mass index in subjects with newly documented AF was 28.9 kg/m(2)(SD 5.6) There was no significant difference in gender mix (P = 0.4), smoking history (P = 0.8) or alcohol history (P = 0.8) with the overall population. Fifty-one (92.7%) subjects had a CHA2DS2VaSC score ≥ 2 of whom 33 (64.7%) were eventually anticoagulated and nine (17.6%) commenced on Aspirin. The rate of newly identified patients in AF was lower than in previous reported key studies because of a higher rate of subjects with known AF. CONCLUSION: Opportunistic AF screening in a rural environment identified a substantial number of new cases, although less than in previous screening studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smyth et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial Fibrillation (n=7,262). Opportunistic screening using radial pulse palpation and 12-lead ECG was evaluated on Newly detected atrial fibrillation. Opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation in a rural population of adults aged ≥65 years identified newly detected AF in 0.76% of subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: