Sullivan [1982] has stated without reservation that our paper [Tolmasoff et al., 1980] did not present data supporting the possibility that superoxide dismutase has a role in determining longevity in mammalian species. He states that the data instead support the hypothesis that there is no association between superoxide dismutase and lifespan. On reading his arguments, I find no errors in our data analysis or in the conclusion made. Instead, I find he has failed to recognize the critical components of our data and has consequently misinterpreted the results. Because similar oversight might be made by other readers of this paper, I have included a brief review of the rationale underlying our investigation of longevity determinants in mammalian species along with the reply to Sullivan's criticisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard G. Cutler (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: