Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three new copper compounds, Cu 2 [C 12 H 8 N 2 ] 2 [C 28 H 20 S 4 O 16 ][H 2 O] 11.9 ( 1 ), Cu 2 [C 12 H 8 N 2 ] 3 [C 28 H 20 S 4 O 16 ][H 2 O] 5 ( 2 ), and Cu 2 [C 12 H 8 N 2 ] 4 [C 24 H 12 S 8 O 16 ][H 2 O] 10.5 ( 3 ), were hydrothermally synthesized and structurally determined by X-ray diffraction and TG-DTA analyses. Interestingly, Compounds 1 and 2 were synthesized in a one-pot reaction. Complexes 1 and 3 contain capsule units, which are further assembled into three-dimensional (3-D) architectures with α-Po-related topology by π−π stacking and/or hydrogen-bonding interactions. In compound 2, the zigzag chains are bridged into a 2-D 6 3 or 4 4 net by π−π stacking interactions, which are stacked further into a 3-D supramolecular topology by hydrogen-bonding interactions. It is obvious that the weak intramolecular/intermolecular interactions play an important role in the formation of supramolecular networks, especially in linking low-dimensional entities into high-dimensional supramolecular frameworks. In these complexes (together with two previous compounds we prepared at room temperature), p -sulfonatocalix[4]arene (C4AS) and p -sulfonatothiacalix[4]arene (TC4AS) ligands assuming cone shape bond to the copper cations in different ways which facilitate the formation of different topologies. Compounds 1 − 3 exhibit blue emission in the solid state at room temperature and their thermal properties are examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bi et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: