Key result
Presepsin outperforms CRP and PCT for early infection detection in heart transplant recipients.
Why the study?
Traditional biomarkers CRP and procalcitonin have limitations in distinguishing infections from systemic inflammatory response syndrome in heart transplant patients, necessitating evaluation of emerging markers Presepsin and IL-6 for early postoperative infection detection.
Do Presepsin and IL-6 outperform CRP and PCT in detecting early postoperative infections in heart transplant recipients?
Observational (n=126)
No
Do Presepsin and IL-6 outperform CRP and PCT in detecting early postoperative infections in heart transplant recipients?
Presepsin and IL-6 are superior to traditional biomarkers like CRP and PCT for the early detection of postoperative infections in heart transplant recipients.
Presepsin and IL-6 may aid post-HTx infection diagnosis; observational data leave open routine adoption pending prospective validation.
Background/Objectives: Heart transplantation (HTx) is a lifesaving procedure for end-stage heart failure patients; however, postoperative infections remain a major challenge due to immunosuppressive therapy and surgical complications. Traditional biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have limitations in distinguishing infections from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Emerging markers such as Presepsin and interleukin-6 (IL-6) may improve diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the kinetics and reliability of these four inflammatory biomarkers in heart transplant recipients in the immediate postoperative period. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 126 patients who underwent HTx at Policlinic of Bari between January 2022 and November 2024. Patients were categorized into infected (n = 26) and non-infected (n = 100) groups based on clinical and microbiological criteria. Biomarkers (CRP, PCT, Presepsin, and IL-6) were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10. Statistical analyses included the Mann–Whitney U test and logistic regression to identify the independent predictors of infection. Results: CRP and PCT levels differed significantly between the groups only on day 10, limiting their use as early infection markers. In contrast, Presepsin levels were significantly elevated in infected patients from day 1 (p < 0.001), whereas IL-6 levels showed significant differences from day 3 onward. Presepsin showed the strongest association with infection in the early postoperative phase. Conclusions: Presepsin and IL-6 outperformed CRP and PCT in detecting early postoperative infections in heart transplant recipients. Their early elevation supports their use as reliable markers for guiding timely clinical intervention and improving patient outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger cohorts and with different immunosuppressive regimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giovannico et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Heart transplant recipients (n=126). Postoperative infection vs. No infection was evaluated on Biomarker elevation (Presepsin) on postoperative day 1 (p=<0.001). Presepsin levels were significantly elevated in infected heart transplant recipients from postoperative day 1 (p < 0.001), outperforming CRP and PCT for early infection detection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: