Key result
Rectus sheath catheters linked to ~1 day faster mobilization versus epidural infusion, with equivalent analgesia.
Why the study?
The efficacy of rectus sheath catheters compared with epidural infusion analgesia for postoperative analgesia following laparotomy for colorectal surgery was not well known.
Do rectus sheath catheters improve postoperative analgesia, time to mobilization, and length of stay in patients undergoing laparotomy for colorectal surgery compared to epidural infusion analgesia?
Observational (n=95)
No
Do rectus sheath catheters improve postoperative analgesia, time to mobilization, and length of stay in patients undergoing laparotomy for colorectal surgery compared to epidural infusion analgesia?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.4% vs 3.5%
p-value: p=<0.05
Rectus sheath catheters provide equivalent analgesia to epidurals following laparotomy for colorectal surgery, while significantly reducing time to mobilization.
May enable earlier mobilization with equivalent analgesia after laparotomy; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Introduction Rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) are increasingly being used to provide postoperative analgesia following laparotomy for colorectal surgery. Little is known about their efficacy in comparison with epidural infusion analgesia (EIA). They are potentially better as they avoid the recognised complications associated with EIA. This study compares these two methods of analgesia. Outcomes include average pain scores, time to mobilisation and length of stay. Methods This was a 33-month single centre observational study including all patients undergoing elective open or laparoscopic-converted-to-open colorectal resection for both benign and malignant disease. Patients received either EIA or RSCs. Data were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively. Results A total of 95 patients were identified. Indications for surgery, operation and complications were recorded. The mean time to mobilisation was significantly shorter in patients who had RSCs compared with EIA patients (2.4 vs 3.5 days, p<0.05). There was no difference in postoperative pain scores or length of stay. Conclusions RSCs provide equivalent analgesia to EIA and avoid the recognised potential complications of EIA. They are associated with a shorter time to mobilisation. Their use should be adopted more widely.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tudor et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Colorectal surgery (n=95). Rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) vs. Epidural infusion analgesia (EIA) was evaluated on Time to mobilisation (days) (p=<0.05). Rectus sheath catheters were associated with a significantly shorter mean time to mobilisation compared with epidural infusion analgesia (2.4 vs 3.5 days, p<0.05), with equivalent analgesia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: