Comprehensive care programmes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and real-world studies

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

Background Different comprehensive care programmes (CCPs) have been developed for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), but data regarding their effectiveness have been controversial. PubMed and Embase were searched to 1 st June 2017 for articles that investigated the effects of the different types of CCPs on hospitalization or mortality rates in COPD. Results A total of 67 studies including 3472633 patients (mean age: 76.1±12.7 years old; 41% male) were analyzed. CCPs reduced all-cause hospitalizations (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.79; P<0.001; I 2 :96%) and mortality (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.573-0.83; P<0.001; I 2 :75%). Subgroup analyses for different CCP types were performed. Hospitalizations were reduced by pharmacist-led medication reviews (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.37-0.78; P=0.001; I 2 :49%), structured care programmes (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.66-0.87; P<0.0001; I 2 :88%) and self-management programmes (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.99; P<0.05; I 2 :78%), but not continuity of care programmes (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.36-1.36; P=0.29; I 2 :100%), early support discharge or home care packages (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.91-1.04; P=0.37; I 2 :0%) or telemonitoring (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.32-1.18; P=0.14; I 2 :94%). Mortality was reduced by early support discharge or home care packages (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.30-0.80; P<0.01; I 2 :72%), structured care programmes (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.90; P<0.01; I 2 :61%) and telemonitoring (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.31-0.89; P<0.05; I 2 :0%), but not self-management programmes (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.99; P<0.05; I 2 :78%). Conclusions Comprehensive care programmes reduce hospitalization and mortality in COPD patients.