Key result
Exclusive CO2-guided EVAR for ruptured AAA achieves 100% technical success in a small pilot study.
Why the study?
Hemorrhagic shock associated with iodinated contrast medium during EVAR for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm increases the risk of acute kidney injury, and eliminating iodinated contrast may reduce this risk.
Is endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using exclusively carbon dioxide angiography feasible and safe?
Observational (n=8)
Is endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using exclusively carbon dioxide angiography feasible and safe?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exclusive use of CO2 angiography during emergent EVAR for ruptured AAA is technically feasible and may help limit contrast-induced acute kidney injury.
Introduction: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) has become a common approach. Hemorrhagic shock associated with the use of iodinated contrast medium (ICM) increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Theoretically, eliminating ICM from EVAR can decrease that risk. The aim of this pilot study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of emergent EVAR performed with the exclusive use of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) for a rAAA. Methods: Since 2021, all consecutive rAAAs with hemorrhagic shock and suitable anatomical criteria for a standard endograft have been treated by EVAR with the exclusive use of CO 2 using an automated CO 2 injector (Angiodroid SpA, San Lazzaro di Savena, Italy). Results: Eight percutaneous EVARs were performed under local anesthesia. Median age was 78 (interquartile range [IQR]=6) years, 5 patients were male. The technical success was 100%, the 30-day mortality was 25% (n=2), the median amount of administered CO 2 was 400 (IQR=60) ml. The median change in serum creatinine level between admission, post-operative and 30-day values was an increase of 0.14 mg/dL and a decrease of 0.11 mg/dL, respectively. Post-operative AKI occurred in the two patients who died. All 6 surviving patients showed sac shrinkage >5 mm, and no reinterventions at a median follow-up of 10 months. Conclusions: Endovascular repair of rAAA with the exclusive use of CO 2 as contrast agent is technically feasible and safe. Further studies are needed to determine whether CO 2 increases survival rate and limits the progression of renal dysfunction after endovascular repair of rAAA. Clinical Impact The recorded rate of post-operative AKI after endovascular repair of rAAA performed with the use of CO 2 found in this pilot study was significantly lower than the one reported in the literature with the use of ICM. Our hyphotesis is that the use of CO 2 during rEVAR might increase survival rate and limits the progression of renal dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Massaini et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) with hemorrhagic shock (n=8). Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with exclusive use of carbon dioxide (CO2) was evaluated on Feasibility and safety (technical success and 30-day mortality). Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using exclusive CO2 angiography achieved 100% technical success and a 30-day mortality of 25% in a pilot study of 8 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: