Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUNDThe impact of resection margin status on long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for patients with pancreatic head carcinoma remains controversial and depends on the method used in the histopathological study of the resected specimens.This study aimed to examine the impact of resection margin status on the long-term overall survival of patients with pancreatic head carcinoma after PD using the tumor node metastasis standard. METHODSConsecutive patients with pancreatic head carcinoma who underwent PD at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital between May 2010 and May 2016 were included.The impact of resection margin status on long-term survival was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTSAmong the 124 patients, R0 resection was achieved in 85 patients (68.5%),R1 resection in 38 patients (30.7%) and R2 resection in 1 patient (0.8%).The 1-and 3year overall survival (OS) rates were significantly higher for the patients who underwent R0 resection than the rates for those who underwent R1 resection (1year OS rates: 69.4% vs 53.0%; 3-year OS rates: 26.9% vs 11.7%).Multivariate analysis showed that resection margin status and venous invasion were significant risk factors for OS. CONCLUSIONResection margin was an independent risk factor for OS for patients with pancreatic head carcinoma after PD.R0 resection was associated with significantly better OS after surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: