Key result
A standardized protocol is linked to a ~115% increase in postcardiac surgery handover scores.
Why the study?
Handover from the cardiovascular operating room to the intensive care unit is variable in structure and content, leading to potential omission and miscommunication of critical information causing patient harm.
Does a standardised handover protocol improve the quality of handovers from the cardiovascular operating room to the cardiovascular intensive care unit?
Does a standardised handover protocol improve the quality of handovers from the cardiovascular operating room to the cardiovascular intensive care unit?
Mean Difference: 7.5 (95% CI 5.8–9.2)
Absolute Event Rate: 14% vs 6.5%
p-value: p=0.001
Implementation of a standardised handover protocol for post-cardiac surgery patients significantly improved handover quality, reduced interruptions, and enhanced patient care planning.
Supports local quality initiatives; leaves open effects on clinical outcomes and generalizability.
Handovers from the cardiovascular operating room (CVOR) to the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) are complex processes involving the transfer of information, equipment and responsibility, at a time when the patient is most vulnerable. This transfer is typically variable in structure, content and execution. This variability can lead to the omission and miscommunication of critical information leading to patient harm. We set out to improve the quality of patient handover from the CVOR to the CVICU by introducing a standardised handover protocol. This study is an interventional time-series study over a 4-month period at an adult cardiac surgery centre. A standardised handover protocol was developed using quality improvement methodologies. The protocol included a handover content checklist and introduction of a formal 'sterile cockpit' timeout. Implementation of the protocol was refined using monthly iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act. The primary outcome was the quality of handovers, measured by a Handover Score, comprising handover content, teamwork and patient care planning indicators. Secondary outcomes included handover duration, adherence to the standardised handover protocol and handover team satisfaction surveys. 37 handovers were observed (6 pre intervention and 31 post intervention). The mean handover score increased from 6.5 to 14.0 (maximum 18 points). Specific improvements included fewer handover interruptions and more frequent postoperative patient care planning. Average handover duration increased slightly from 2:40 to 2:57 min. Caregivers noted improvements in teamwork, content received and patient care planning. The majority (>95%) agreed that the intervention was a valuable addition to the CVOR to CVICU handover process. Implementation of a standardised handover protocol for postcardiac surgery patients was associated with fewer interruptions during handover, more reliable transfer of critical content and improved patient care planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gleicher et al. (2017) studied Postcardiac surgery handovers (n=37). Standardised handover protocol vs. Pre-intervention standard handover was evaluated on Quality of handovers, measured by a Handover Score (maximum 18 points) (MD 7.5, 95% CI 5.8 to 9.2, p=0.001). Implementation of a standardised handover protocol for postcardiac surgery patients significantly increased the mean handover score from 6.5 to 14.0 (MD 7.5).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: