Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The partial oxidation of [Ni(II/II)(2)(RCS(2))(4)] (R = Et (1), n-Pr (2), and n-Bu (3)) with iodine affords the MMX chain compounds [Ni(II/III)(2)(RCS(2))(4)I](infinity) (R = Et (4), n-Pr (5), and n-Bu (6)), respectively. The crystal structures of 4-6 consist of neutral one-dimensional (1-D) chains with a repeating -Ni-Ni-I- unit. The room-temperature (RT) structure of 4 indicates a charge-polarization (CP) state {-Ni((2.5-delta)+)-Ni((2.5+delta)+)-I(-)-Ni((2.5-delta)+)-Ni((2.5+delta)+)-I(-)- (delta << 0.5)} close to an averaged valence state judged by the Ni-I distances. In contrast, 5 and 6 exhibit a 3-fold periodicity of a -Ni-Ni-I- unit due to the disorder of the dithiocarboxylato ligands. Compounds 4-6 show typical semiconducting behavior and exhibit an intense sharp absorption band centered at 5400 cm(-1), which is attributed to a Mott-Hubbard gap due to a relatively large on-site Coulomb repulsion energy U of the nickel atoms. The high-temperature magnetic susceptibilities of 4-6 can be described by a 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain model with |J|/k(B) ranging from 898(2) to 939(3) K. Compounds 4 and 5 undergo a spin-Peierls (SP) transition at relatively high T(sp) = 47 and 36 K, respectively, which are accompanied by superlattice reflections corresponding to a 2-fold -Ni-Ni-I- period below T(sp). By determining the superstructure of 4 at 26 K, we conclude that the valence-ordered state changes from the CP in the RT phase to the alternate charge-polarization (ACP) state of -Ni((2.5-delta)+)-Ni((2.5+delta)+)-I(-)-Ni((2.5+delta)+)-Ni((2.5-delta)+)-I(-)- in the SP phase. Such a spin-Peierls transition could not be observed for 6.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitsumi et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: