Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A BSTRACT Background: Electrochemical biosensors can analyze biomarkers quickly and accurately. However, surface modification techniques and surface modification materials can affect their working. Aims and Objectives: In this study, three different methods of screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) modification were tested and compared. Materials and Methods: Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs), gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), and electrodeposited gold were used for SPCE modification. ZnONPs and AuNPs were synthesized and characterized using UV-Vis spectroscopy, FTIR, XRD, DLS, and SEM. ZnONPs and AuNPs were drop-cast on the working electrode of SPCE, while hydrochloroauric acid (HAuCl₄) was used to deposit gold in nanoform via chronoamperometry. All the modified SPCEs were subjected to cyclic voltammetry for assessment and comparison with the bare (unmodified) SPCE. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test was used for statistical analysis. Results: It was found that ZnONP modification performed best at a concentration of 0.75 mg/mL, producing a peak current of 0.29 mA. The undiluted AuNP suspensions did better, reaching 0.45 mA. Among the methods examined, electrodeposited gold, using 20 µM HAuCl₄ solution, delivered the highest peak current of 0.79 mA and the largest electroactive surface area of 0.53 cm². Conclusion: The standardized conditions established herein are expected to serve as a reproducible SPCE platform for future biosensor development. This is particularly relevant for point-of-care detection of clinically relevant biomarkers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yadav et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: