Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The reaction of the disulfido-bridged diruthenium complex [Cp*Ru(μ 2 -S 2 )(μ 2 -SPr i ) 2 RuCp*] ( 1; Cp* = η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ) with 2 equiv of [Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 ] in boiling toluene resulted in the formation of the palladium−ruthenium mixed-metal sulfido cluster [(Cp*Ru) 2 (μ 3 -S) 2 Pd 2 (μ 2 -SPr i )(SPr i )(PPh 3 )] ( 2 ). Upon treatment with benzyl bromide, stepwise substitution of the thiolato ligands in 2 by bromo ligands took place to afford the monobromo cluster [(Cp*Ru) 2 (μ 3 -S) 2 Pd 2 (μ 2 -SPr i )Br(PPh 3 )] ( 4 ) and the dibromo cluster [(Cp*Ru) 2 (μ 3 -S) 2 Pd 2 (μ 2 -Br)Br(PPh 3 )] ( 5 ). On the other hand, the cationic palladium−ruthenium sulfido cluster [(Cp*Ru) 2 (μ 3 -S) 2 Pd 2 (μ 2 -Cl)(PPh 3 ) 2 ]Cl ( 7 ) was obtained by the reaction of the hydrosulfido-bridged diruthenium complex [Cp*RuCl(μ 2 -SH) 2 RuClCp*] ( 6 ) with 2 equiv of [Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 ]. The structural feature commonly observed for the 60e clusters 2, 4, 5, and 7 is the presence of a distorted-tetrahedral Pd 2 Ru 2 core containing one Pd−Pd (2.780(1)−2.8130(8) Å) and one Ru−Ru bond (2.6231(7)−2.6386(9) Å) as well as four relatively long Pd−Ru contacts (2.831(1)−3.095(2) Å). Furthermore, 7 reacted with CO to afford the 64e carbonyl cluster [{Cp*Ru(CO)} 2 (μ 3 -S) 2 {PdCl(PPh 3 )} 2 ] ( 8 ) with a boatlike Pd 2 Ru 2 (μ 3 -S) 2 framework. The detailed structures of 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8 have been determined by X-ray crystallography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuwata et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: