This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BAY 81-8973 is a full-length, unmodified, recombinant human factor VIII (FVIII) for the treatment of hemophilia A. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of BAY 81-8973 with antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM) In this phase I, open-label, crossover study, men aged 18–65 years with severe hemophilia A and ≥150 exposure days to FVIII were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of 50 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 or rAHF-PFM, followed by crossover to a single infusion of the other treatment. FVIII levels were measured in plasma over 48 h using one-stage and chromogenic assays. PK parameters, including area under the curve from time zero to the last data point (AUClast; primary outcome) and half-life (t ½) were calculated. A population PK model was developed to simulate various treatment scenarios. Eighteen patients were randomized and analyzed. Using both assays, geometric mean (coefficient of variation [%CV]) AUClast was significantly higher, and t ½ was significantly longer, for BAY 81-8973 versus rAHF-PFM (one-stage, AUClast: 1660 IU·h/dL [29.4] vs. 1310 IU·h/dL [29.0], p < 0.0001; one-stage, t ½: 14.5 [25.7] vs. 11.7 h [27.3], p < 0.0001). Simulations showed that median time to 1 IU/dL was approximately 27% longer for BAY 81-8973 versus rAHF-PFM over doses of 25–50 IU/kg; plasma levels >1 IU/dL could be maintained with 14.4 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 or 39.1 IU/kg rAHF-PFM 3×/week. BAY 81-8973 showed a superior PK profile versus rAHF-PFM. The same FVIII trough threshold level could be achieved with lower doses of BAY 81-8973 versus rAHF-PFM. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02483208.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: