Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The prognostic value of pathologic characteristics of childhood ALK-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphomas (ALCL), such as histologic subtypes, immunophenotype, and presence of the t(2;5) translocation or its variants, was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 375 patients with systemic ALK-positive ALCL included in an international trial launched by the European Intergroup for Childhood Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma were reviewed by an international panel of pathologists based on conventional hematoxylin and eosin-stained and immunostained sections and classified according to the 2001 WHO classification. RESULTS: A small-cell (SC) or lymphohistiocytic (LH) component was observed in 114 (32%) of 361 patients, whereas ALCL of common type was diagnosed in 235 (65%) of 361 patients. Regarding the histologic subtyping of patients within the two categories of ALCL (with v without SC/LH component), the concordance between the national and international reviews was quite good, with a κ index equal to 0.67 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.75). The presence of an SC/LH component was significantly associated with a high risk of failure (hazard ratio [HR], 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.0; P = .002) in the multivariate analysis controlling for clinical characteristics, as well as the perivascular pattern (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.7; P = .01), whereas CD3 positivity was significantly associated with a high risk of failure only in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Our study, which to our knowledge includes the largest series of childhood systemic ALK-positive ALCL so far, demonstrates the adverse prognostic value of SC and/or LH morphologic features. Combining these histologic characteristics with other biologic or clinical factors might have a high potential for future risk stratification and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamant et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: