Key result
Diabetes mellitus linked to ~356% higher risk of CIED infections.
Why the study?
The incidence and causes of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections vary widely, necessitating investigation of frequency and risk factors.
What are the frequency and risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections?
Cohort (n=211)
No
What are the frequency and risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections?
Odds Ratio: 4.56 (95% CI 1.45–14.41)
p-value: p=0.010
In a retrospective cohort, CIED infections occurred in 8.5% of patients, with diabetes, male sex, and age identified as significant risk factors.
Retrospective CIED infection data should not yet alter practice; leaves open need for prospective confirmation of risk factors.
Objective: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) have been increasingly used in recent years. The incidence of infection has ranged from 0.5 % to 12% in the literature. The purposes of this study was to investigate the frequency of CIED infection and to find the causes of infection. Patients and methods: Totally, 211 patients with CIED infection were retrospectively evaluated. For each patient, all the following data were recorded; age, sex, CIED type, accompanying diseases, complete blood count, serum biochemistry, echocardiographic findings and whether first implantation or replacement. In addition, wound culture, antibiotic regime, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and anticoagulation test results were recorded in infected patients. Results: CIED infection was detected in 18 of the 211 patients (8.5%). 15 cases developed infection following the first implantation (10%), and 3 cases after replacement (5%). Infection was detected within 60 days in 5 patients. CIED pocket cultures were positive in 12 patients (66.7%). 13 of 18 infected devices were removed (72.2%). Diabetes mellitus [Odds Ratio, OR: 4.56 (1.449-14.408)] (p=0.010), male sex [OR: 3.84 (1.034-14.232)] (p=0.045) and increasing age [OR: 0.96 (0.932-0.998)] (p=0.038) were found as significant independent variables on development of CIED; but, pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization were not independent variables [OR: 1.66 (0.469-5.929)] (p=0.43). Conclusions: Increasing age, male sex, diabetes mellitus were related to increased frequency of CIED infections. Identification of comorbid conditions prior to CIED implantations may be important in reducing risk of CIED infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deniz et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection (n=211). Diabetes mellitus vs. Absence of diabetes mellitus was evaluated on CIED infection (OR 4.56, 95% CI 1.45-14.41, p=0.010). Diabetes mellitus significantly increased the risk of cardiac implantable electronic device infections (OR 4.56), which occurred in 8.5% of the overall patient cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: