Key result
An outpatient risk-management system increased return to work at 9 months (92% vs 76%) and reduced depressive affect compared to standard care in post-myocardial infarction patients.
Why the study?
The impact of an outpatient risk-management system including transtelephonic ECG monitoring on quality of life after myocardial infarction was examined.
Does an outpatient risk-management system improve quality of life in post-myocardial infarction patients?
RCT (n=238)
Randomized
Does an outpatient risk-management system improve quality of life in post-myocardial infarction patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An outpatient risk-management system with transtelephonic ECG monitoring significantly improves psychological status and return-to-work rates in post-myocardial infarction patients.
The impact of an outpatient, risk-management system, including a transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitor and lidocaine injector, on the quality of life in post-myocardial infarction patients was examined. Patients (n = 238) were assigned randomly to either the system or to standard medical care (control). Quality of life was defined in terms of psychological status, return to work, and social functioning. Relative to control patients, system patients showed a significant decrease in concerns about physical functioning and symptoms, and, over time, reported less depressive affect. At 9-month follow-up, control patients were more than twice as likely to be in the range of clinical depression. Patients' perceptions of their ability to manage a recurrence of cardiac symptoms appeared to be related inversely to depressive affect. Moreover, a larger percentage of system patients (92%) had returned to work by the 9-month follow-up, compared with control patients (76%). There were, however, no significant differences between groups in the degree of impairment in social interaction. Overall, these results indicate that the use of a "system" encouraging patient participation in treatment can significantly improve qualify of life after a myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Follick et al. (1988) conducted an RCT in Post-myocardial infarction (n=238). Outpatient risk-management system (transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitor and lidocaine injector) vs. Standard medical care was evaluated on Return to work at 9-month follow-up. An outpatient risk-management system increased return to work at 9 months (92% vs 76%) and reduced depressive affect compared to standard care in post-myocardial infarction patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: