Key result
DOACs cut major bleeding ~47% versus VKA or LMWH in Child-Pugh B and C cirrhosis.
Why the study?
The safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with Child-Pugh B or C liver cirrhosis is unclear due to their underrepresentation in trials.
Do direct oral anticoagulants reduce major bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with liver cirrhosis?
Meta-Analysis
Do direct oral anticoagulants reduce major bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with liver cirrhosis?
Odds Ratio: 0.53 (95% CI 0.36–0.8)
DOACs appear to be a safer alternative to vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin regarding major bleeding risk in patients with liver cirrhosis, including those with advanced disease.
Supports DOAC preference over VKA/LMWH in Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis to lower major bleeding; strengthens meta-analytic evidence for safer anticoagulation in advanced disease.
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the standard of care for treatment of venous thromboembolism and stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Since patients with Child-Pugh (CP) B or C liver cirrhosis are underrepresented in trials, the safety of DOACs in this population is unclear. Objectives: This study synthesized primary evidence on the safety profile of DOACs in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis. Methods: A literature search of MEDLINE and Embase from inception to October 2025 identified randomized and nonrandomized cohort studies comparing DOAC with vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with liver cirrhosis. Screening and data collection were conducted in duplicate. The primary outcome was major bleeding defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria, stratified by CP class. Data were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model, presented as odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% CIs. Results: = 70) study were included. DOACs reduced major bleeding in both CP class B and C exclusive subgroup and a subgroup with unspecified CP stages of liver cirrhosis (CP B and C: OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.80; CP unspecified: OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98). Conclusion: Based on the findings of this meta-analysis, DOACs may be associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with liver cirrhosis, including those with CP class B and C cirrhosis. The results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted in the context of methodological limitations. Future analysis should evaluate the impact of specific DOACs and dosage on safety outcomes in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tham et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in liver cirrhosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin was evaluated on major bleeding defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36-0.80). Direct oral anticoagulants reduced major bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with Child-Pugh B and C liver cirrhosis (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.36-0.80).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: