Key result
OVX033 triggers cross-reactive T cell responses and protects against three SARS-CoV-2 variants in hamsters.
Why the study?
Spike-based COVID-19 vaccines induce potent neutralizing antibodies but their efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 variants decreases, motivating development of broad-spectrum vaccines.
Does OVX033 provide broad-spectrum protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants in a hamster challenge model?
Does OVX033 provide broad-spectrum protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants in a hamster challenge model?
OVX033, a nucleocapsid-based vaccine candidate, provides broad-spectrum protection against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants in a preclinical hamster model.
Supports N-based OVX033 development for variant-resistant protection; leaves open human efficacy and safety.
Spike-based COVID-19 vaccines induce potent neutralizing antibodies but their efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 variants decreases. OVX033 is a recombinant protein composed of the full-length nucleocapsid (N) protein of SARS-CoV-2 genetically fused to oligoDOM®, a self-assembling domain which improves antigen immunogenicity. OVX033 including N as an antigenic target is proposed as new vaccine candidate providing broad-spectrum protection against sarbecoviruses. OVX033 demonstrated its ability to trigger cross-reactive T cell responses and cross-protection against three variants of SARS-CoV-2 (B.1 Europe, Delta B.1.617.2, and Omicron B.1.1.529) in a hamster challenge model, as evidenced by lower weight loss, lower lung viral loads, and reduced lung histopathological lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Primard et al. (2023) studied SARS-CoV-2 infection. OVX033 (nucleocapsid-based vaccine candidate) was evaluated on Cross-reactive T cell responses and cross-protection (weight loss, lung viral loads, and lung histopathological lesions). OVX033 triggered cross-reactive T cell responses and cross-protection against three SARS-CoV-2 variants in a hamster model, evidenced by lower weight loss, viral loads, and lung lesions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: