Key result
NonlinearTseries, CGManalyzer, and MSMVSampEn compute sample entropy faster than other R packages.
Why the study?
Multiple R packages exist for calculating sample entropy of physiological signals, but their differing designs and parameter settings cause confusion for investigators in selecting the appropriate tool.
This study provides a comprehensive comparison of R packages for calculating sample entropy, offering guidelines for researchers to select the appropriate software for physiological signal analysis.
May expedite entropy analyses in cardiovascular research; leaves open validation before clinical adoption.
Sample entropy is a powerful tool for analyzing the complexity and irregularity of physiology signals which may be associated with human health. Nevertheless, the sophistication of its calculation hinders its universal application. As of today, the R language provides multiple open-source packages for calculating sample entropy. All of which, however, are designed for different scenarios. Therefore, when searching for a proper package, the investigators would be confused on the parameter setting and selection of algorithms. To ease their selection, we have explored the functions of five existing R packages for calculating sample entropy and have compared their computing capability in several dimensions. We used four published datasets on respiratory and heart rate to study their input parameters, types of entropy, and program running time. In summary, NonlinearTseries and CGManalyzer can provide the analysis of sample entropy with different embedding dimensions and similarity thresholds. CGManalyzer is a good choice for calculating multiscale sample entropy of physiological signal because it not only shows sample entropy of all scales simultaneously but also provides various visualization plots. MSMVSampEn is the only package that can calculate multivariate multiscale entropies. In terms of computing time, NonlinearTseries, CGManalyzer, and MSMVSampEn run significantly faster than the other two packages. Moreover, we identify the issues in MVMSampEn package. This article provides guidelines for researchers to find a suitable R package for their analysis and applications using sample entropy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2019) conducted a review in Physiology signals (respiratory and heart rate). R packages for calculating sample entropy was evaluated. NonlinearTseries, CGManalyzer, and MSMVSampEn run significantly faster than other R packages for calculating sample entropy, with CGManalyzer providing multiscale analysis and visualization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: