Key result
Tetherin restricts influenza virus by tethering newly budded particles despite partial viral counteraction.
Why the study?
The antiviral activity of tetherin against influenza virus and the mechanisms by which influenza virus counteracts tetherin-mediated restriction were not fully understood.
This study identifies tetherin as a potent antiviral factor against influenza virus and reveals the molecular mechanisms by which the virus partially evades this host defense.
May inform antiviral development targeting NS1/NA; leaves open therapeutic potential pending in vivo validation.
Influenza virus infections lead to a burst of type I interferon (IFN) in the human respiratory tract, which most probably accounts for a rapid control of the virus. Although in mice, IFN-induced Mx1 factor mediates a major part of this response, the situation is less clear in humans. Interestingly, a recently identified IFN-induced cellular protein, tetherin (also known as CD317, BST-2, or HM1.24), exerts potent antiviral activity against a broad range of retroviruses, as well as several other enveloped viruses, by impeding the release of newly generated viral particles from the cell surface. Here we show that influenza virus belongs to the targets of this potent antiviral factor. Ectopic expression of tetherin strongly inhibited fully replicative influenza virus. In addition, depleting endogenous tetherin increased viral production of influenza virions, both in cells constitutively expressing tetherin and upon its induction by IFN. We further demonstrate, by biochemical and morphological means, that tetherin exerts its antiviral action by tethering newly budded viral particles, a mechanism similar to the one that operates against HIV-1. In addition, we determined that the magnitude of tetherin antiviral activity is comparable with or higher than the one of several previously identified anti-influenza cellular factors, such as MxA, ADAR1, ISG15, and viperin. Finally, we demonstrate that influenza virus reduces the impact of tetherin-mediated restriction on its replication by several mechanisms. First, the influenza virus NS1 protein impedes IFN-mediated tetherin induction. Second, influenza infection leads to a decrease of tetherin steady state levels, and the neuraminidase surface protein partly counteracts its activity. Overall, our study helps to delineate the intricate molecular battle taking place between influenza virus and its host cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mangeat et al. (2012) studied Influenza virus infection. Tetherin/BST-2 expression vs. Endogenous or depleted tetherin was evaluated on Viral production and release. Tetherin exerts potent antiviral activity against influenza virus by tethering newly budded particles, though the virus partially counteracts this restriction via NS1 and neuraminidase proteins.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: