Why the study?
Patients with diabetes mellitus experience worse outcomes after PCI than patients without diabetes, necessitating evaluation of new device technologies in this population.
Does the Abluminus DES+ system improve 2-year MACE outcomes in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=2,500)
Yes
Does the Abluminus DES+ system improve 2-year MACE outcomes in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients undergoing PCI?
The Abluminus DES+ system demonstrates a low overall 2-year MACE rate (3.0%) in an all-comers PCI registry, though diabetic patients still experience higher MACE rates than non-diabetics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consistent 1-year MACE rates with Abluminus DES+ across diabetes status; leaves open dedicated-stent superiority versus standard DES in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) represents a challenging subset of population as they experience worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention than patients without diabetes. We evaluated the 2-year efficacy and safety profile of the Abluminus DES+ in patients with diabetes within the population enrolled in the large multicenter en-ABL e-registry. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, all-comers registry performed in 31 centers in India. We analyze patients according to the diagnosis of DM and insulin dependency (ID or Non-ID): non-DM (1641 patients), NIDDM (721 patients), IDDM (138 patients). The primary endpoint was a composite of device-oriented major adverse cardiac events (MACE): cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)/ target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2-year. Stent thrombosis (ST) at any time point was also recorded. RESULTS: The MACE rate at 2-year follow-up was 3.0% in the overall population with DM patients showing a higher rate of primary endpoint compared to non-DM (4.4% vs. 2.4%, P=0.025). Rate of cardiac death was actually low and consistent between the 2 groups (1.7% vs. 0.9%, P=0.100). At 2-year follow-up, the rate of ST was 0.9% in DM patients versus 0.5% in non-DM, P=0.213. CONCLUSIONS: At 2-year follow-up, the Abluminus DES+ technology that merges the features of a sirolimus coated balloon with those of a bioresorbable polymer drug eluting stent appears to be safe and effective. This safety/efficacy profile was consistent in patients with or without DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Testa et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=2,500). Diabetes mellitus vs. Non-diabetes mellitus was evaluated on Composite of device-oriented major adverse cardiac events (MACE): cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)/ target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2-year (p=0.025).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: