Why the study?
Patients with diabetes mellitus have poorer outcomes after PCI, and the efficacy and safety of the Abluminus DES+ stent in diabetic patients needed evaluation.
Does a sirolimus eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer and sirolimus coated balloon provide consistent outcomes in all-comers PCI patients regardless of diabetes status?
Observational (n=1,853)
Yes
Does a sirolimus eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer and sirolimus coated balloon provide consistent outcomes in all-comers PCI patients regardless of diabetes status?
The novel sirolimus eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer and sirolimus coated balloon demonstrates low 1-year MACE rates in an all-comers PCI population, with consistent performance regardless of diabetes status or insulin dependency.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consistent 1-year MACE with Abluminus DES+ across DM subgroups; leaves open efficacy versus contemporary stents in randomized diabetic PCI trials.
BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have poorer outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention than patients without diabetes. The Abluminus DES+™ drug-eluting stent (DES) features a novel technology of fusion coating of PLLA bioresorbable polymer on both the abluminal surface of the stent and exposed parts of the balloon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy/safety profile of the Abluminus DES+ in an all-comers population with minimal exclusion criteria and with a specific focus on diabetic patients. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, all-comers registry performed in 31 centers in India. Patients were analyzed according to the diagnosis of DM and insulin dependency (ID or Non ID): non-DM (1256 patients), NIDDM (498 patients), IDDM (99 patients). The primary endpoint was a composite of device-oriented major adverse cardiac events (MACE): cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)/ target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year. Stent thrombosis (ST) at any time point was also recorded. RESULTS: The MACE rate at 1 year in the overall population was 2.3% and it was mainly driven by a 1.57% rate of TLR/TVR. Although patients with IDDM showed slightly higher figures for MACE (non-DM 2.3%, NIDDM 2.8%, IDDM 4%, P=0.09), as well as for single end-points, none of them reached statistical significance. The rate of ST was 0.56%, 0.4%, 1% for non-DM, NIDDM and IDDM group, respectively (P=0.6). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the Abluminus DES+ is consistent among patients with or without diabetes, regardless the insulin dependency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Testa et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=1,853). Abluminus DES+ implantation vs. Compared across non-diabetic, non-insulin-dependent, and insulin-dependent diabetic groups was evaluated on Composite of device-oriented major adverse cardiac events (MACE): cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)/ target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year (p=0.09).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: