Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interfacial engineering of sulfide-based solid electrolyte/lithium-transition-metal oxide active materials in all-solid-state battery cathodes is vital for cell performance parameters, such as high-rate charge/discharge, long lifetime, and wide temperature range. A typical interfacial engineering method is the surface coating of the cathode active material with a buffer layer, such as LiNbO 3 . However, cell performance reportedly degrades under harsh environments even with a LiNbO 3 coating, such as high temperatures and high cathode potentials. Therefore, we investigated the interfacial degradation mechanism focusing on the solid electrolyte side for half cells employing the cathode mixture of argyrodite-type Li 6 PS 5 Cl/LiNbO 3 -coated LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 exposed at 60 °C and 4.25 and 4.55 V vs Li/Li + using transmission electron microscopy/electron diffraction (TEM/ED) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). The TEM/ED results indicated that the ED pattern of the argyrodite structure disappeared and changed to an amorphous phase as the cells degraded. Moreover, the crystal phases of LiCl and Li 2 S appeared simultaneously. Finally, XAS analysis confirmed the decrease in the PS 4 units of the argyrodite structure and the increase in local P–S–P domains with delithiation from the interfacial solid electrolyte, corresponding to the TEM/ED results. In addition, the formation of P–O bonds was confirmed during degradation at higher cathode potentials, such as 4.55 V vs Li/Li + . These results indicate that the degradation of this interfacial region determines the cell performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morino et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: