Key result
Routine defibrillation threshold testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement is no longer recommended as prior trials showed no difference in efficacy or mortality.
Why the study?
Routine defibrillation threshold testing at ICD implantation is no longer recommended and is rarely performed except in special circumstances.
Case Report
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the early years of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement, defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was often routinely performed at the time of the initial implantation.1 Subsequent randomized clinical trials comparing routine DFT testing to omission of DFT testing at implantation showed no clinical difference in the efficacy of subsequent appropriate ICD shocks, arrhythmic death, and all-cause mortality.2,3 Given this evidence, routine DFT testing is no longer recommended and is rarely performed clinically except in special circumstances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaptein et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Shock vector modulation via axillary vein coil was evaluated. Routine defibrillation threshold testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement is no longer recommended as prior trials showed no difference in efficacy or mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: