Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Employing a narrative framework, this article explores President Clinton's speech of apology for the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. Catalysts leading to the experiment, how the experiment was enacted, and the lingering impact of the experiment on African Americans' perceptions of the public health system are described. The U.S. government's rhetorical stance toward the experiment is analyzed in terms of how it creates a narrative of remembrance, redefinition, and reconciliation. The article argues the discourse serves to redefine the role of the Tuskegee Institute in the experiment while embracing the grand narrative of modernism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ronald J. Stephens Lynn M. Harter (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: