In Africa, state-sponsored cash transfer programs now reach nearly 50 million people. Do these programs raise long-term living standards? We examine this question using experimental data from two unconditional cash transfer programs implemented by the Zambian Government. We find far-reaching effects of the programs both on food security and consumption as well as on a range of productive outcomes. After three years, household spending is on average 67 percent larger than the value of the transfer received, implying a sizeable multiplier effect, which works through increased non-farm activity and agricultural production. • Two unconditional cash transfers implemented by the Government of Zambia show strong protective and productive effects. • Both programs generate large income multipliers, averaging 1.67 across both programs. • Multipliers are generated through investment in non-farm activity in one case, and agricultural output in the other case. • Policy implication is that government sponsored unconditional cash transfers to the ultra-poor can lead to increases in long-term living standards and play an important part of an inclusive growth development strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Handa et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: