Key result
Pre-angiographic MHR predicts clinically significant carotid stenosis better than FAR and hsCRP.
Why the study?
Monocyte count to HDL-C Ratio (MHR) and Fibrinogen to Albumin Ratio (FAR) have recently emerged as markers of inflammation in atherosclerotic diseases, but their relationship with carotid artery stenosis severity in asymptomatic patients was unclear.
Does the monocyte to HDL ratio predict clinically significant carotid stenosis in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease?
Observational (n=300)
Does the monocyte to HDL ratio predict clinically significant carotid stenosis in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease?
p-value: p=<0.05
Pre-angiographic monocyte to HDL ratio is an independent predictor of clinically significant carotid stenosis in asymptomatic patients, outperforming FAR and hsCRP.
MHR may aid risk stratification in asymptomatic carotid disease; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Monocyte count to HDL-C Ratio (MHR) and Fibrinogen to Albumin Ratio (FAR) have recently emerged as markers of inflammation in atherosclerotic diseases. Our goal was to investigate the relationships of MHR and FAR with the severity of carotid artery stenosis (CAS) in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease. METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 300 patients with asymptomatic CAS. Pre-angiographic MHR, FAR, and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured. Carotid angiography was performed in patients with ≥50% stenosis on carotid ultrasonography. Patients were first split into 2 groups based on the degree of CAS and then tertiles (T) of MHR. RESULTS: 96 patients had clinically insignificant CAS (<50%) (Group-1), and 204 patients had clinically significant CAS (≥50%) (Group-2). Group-2 had higher MHR, FAR, and hsCRP than group-1. Patients in T3 had higher MHR, FAR, and hsCRP than in T1 and T2. MHR, FAR, and hsCRP were correlated with each other (p<0.001, for all). MHR, FAR, and hsCRP were independent predictors of significant CAS. MHR better predicted a significant CAS than FAR and hsCRP (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Pre-angiographic MHR may be a better predictor than FAR and hsCRP in identifying a clinically significant carotid stenosis in patients with asymptomatic CAS. Patients with asymptomatic CAS and a high level of MHR should be followed-up closely to supervise risk-factor control and intensify treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yurtdaş et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Asymptomatic carotid artery disease (n=300). Monocyte count to HDL-C Ratio (MHR) vs. Fibrinogen to Albumin Ratio (FAR) and hsCRP was evaluated on Clinically significant carotid stenosis (≥50%) (p=<0.05). Pre-angiographic Monocyte to HDL-C Ratio (MHR) independently predicted clinically significant carotid stenosis better than Fibrinogen to Albumin Ratio and hsCRP (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: