Key result
Adding D-dimer and GFAP to the FAST-ED scale improves LVO detection to 95% AUC.
Why the study?
Identification of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusions for emergency treatment is challenging and requires improved diagnostic accuracy.
Does the combination of blood biomarkers (D-dimer, GFAP) and stroke scales improve diagnostic accuracy for large vessel occlusion in patients with suspected stroke compared to stroke scales alone?
Observational (n=170)
No
Does the combination of blood biomarkers (D-dimer, GFAP) and stroke scales improve diagnostic accuracy for large vessel occlusion in patients with suspected stroke compared to stroke scales alone?
Odds Ratio: 15.4 (95% CI 4.9–57.6)
p-value: p=<0.001
The combination of D-dimer, GFAP, and stroke scales provides a highly accurate tool for identifying large vessel occlusion in patients with suspected stroke.
May improve LVO identification in suspected stroke; leaves open need for prospective validation before changing triage.
Background and Purpose Acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusions (LVO) is a major contributor to stroke deaths and disabilities; however, identification for emergency treatment is challenging. Aims To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a panel of biomarkers for LVO prediction. Methods 170 patients with suspected stroke were recruited retrospectively at one hospital. We analysed the plasma levels of D-dimer, OPN, OPG, GFAP, vWF, and ADAMTS13 in LVO vs non-LVO. Diagnostic performance was estimated by using blood biomarkers alone or in combination with NIHSS-derived stroke severity scales. Results Our patient cohort comprised 20% stroke mimics, 11% transient ischemic attack, 11% hemorrhagic stroke, 15% LVO ischemic stroke, 28% non-LVO ischemic stroke, and 15% ischemic stroke with unknown LVO status. Multivariable analysis found that the optimal set of blood biomarkers for LVO prediction was D-dimer (OR 15.4, 95% CI 4.9 to 57.6; p-value<0.001) and GFAP (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99; p-value=0.03). The combination of D-dimer and GFAP with stroke scales significantly improved LVO prediction, compared to the stroke scales alone (p-value<0.001). The combination of biomarkers with constructed FAST-ED or EMSA scales achieved an AUC of 95% (95% CI 91-100%) or 93% (CI 95% 89-97%), a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI 71-98%) or 86 (95% CI 66-97%), and a specificity of 95% (95% CI 89-98%) or 94% (95% CI 88-98%), for LVO prediction, respectively. Conclusions The combination of D-dimer, GFAP, and stroke scales could provide a simple and highly accurate tool for identifying LVO patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaude et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Suspected stroke (n=170). D-dimer and GFAP biomarkers vs. Non-LVO suspected stroke was evaluated on Large vessel occlusion (LVO) prediction (OR 15.4, 95% CI 4.9-57.6, p=<0.001). The combination of D-dimer and GFAP blood biomarkers with stroke scales significantly improved the identification of large vessel occlusions, achieving an AUC of 95% when combined with the FAST-ED scale.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: