Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A portable pheromone-trap system was developed for monitoring drone honey bee, Apis mellifera L., populations. The wind-directed system included a white nylon net, pheromone lure (porous polyethylene rod treated with synthetic E-9-oxo-2-decenoic acid [9-ODA]), 6.1-m support, and sample bag holder. The trapping site and anemotactic flight behavior of drones affected capture rates. Traps baited with 5 or 10 mg synthetic 9-ODA routinely captured 150–300 drones per 3 min during the 90-min periods of peak flight. Nonreusable lure components, including 5 mg synthetic 9-ODA, cost approximately one-fourth of the minimum price for two virgin queens. This trap system has potential as a survey and management tool for Africanized honey bee suppression programs and for control of local drone populations by queen breeders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jon L. Williams (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: