Key result
The 30-item ABG-LA Barriers Scale shows excellent reliability for assessing nurses' local anesthesia barriers.
Why the study?
Despite strong evidence supporting local anesthesia to reduce pain during arterial blood gas sampling, its use in clinical practice remains limited due to perceived barriers among nurses.
Cross-Sectional (n=558)
Yes
The ABG-LA Barriers Scale is a valid and reliable instrument to assess nurses' perceived barriers to using local anesthesia prior to arterial blood gas sampling.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports research on barriers to local anesthesia in ABG sampling; prospective validation required before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Arterial blood gas (ABG) sampling is a common and painful procedure. Despite strong evidence supporting the use of local anesthesia to reduce pain, its use in clinical practice remains limited. AIM: To develop and validate a scale assessing nurses' perceived barriers to the use of infiltrated local anesthesia prior to ABG sampling. DESIGN: Instrument development and psychometric validation study. METHODS: A two-stage design was conducted between October 2024 and June 2025. In Stage 1, items were generated from a literature review and refined through a four-round Delphi process with expert nurses. Content validity was assessed using the item-level Content Validity Index, Aiken's V and modified kappa. In Stage 2, a cross-sectional online survey of 558 registered nurses across Spain was performed. Construct validity was evaluated using Rasch analysis, and reliability was assessed through internal consistency and test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The Delphi process resulted in an initial 34-item scale. Psychometric evaluation led to a final 30-item version with good fit indices and no relevant differential item functioning by gender, professional experience, specialty, academic level or type of institution. Internal consistency was high (ω = 0.898 [95% CI: 0.886-0.910]; α = 0.892 [95% CI: 0.879-0.904]) and test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.912 [95% CI: 0.863-0.971]). Higher scores were observed for barriers related to training, knowledge and organizational factors. CONCLUSION: The ABG-LA Barriers Scale is a valid and reliable instrument (with excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability) to assess nurses' perceived barriers to the use of local anesthesia prior to ABG sampling. Its use may support clinical decision-making and development of strategies to improve pain management and patient experience in practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barroso-Rodríguez et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Perceived barriers to local anesthesia in arterial blood sampling (n=558). ABG-LA Barriers Scale was evaluated on Scale validity and reliability. The 30-item ABG-LA Barriers Scale demonstrated high internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability for assessing nurses' perceived barriers to local anesthesia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: