Key result
Baseline aortic 18F-NaF uptake fails to predict aortic calcification progression in postmenopausal women.
Why the study?
Aortic 18F-NaF uptake reflects metabolically active calcification, but its association with aortic calcification progression detected by CT is unclear.
Does baseline aortic 18F-NaF uptake predict progression of aortic calcification in postmenopausal women?
Cohort (n=21)
Does baseline aortic 18F-NaF uptake predict progression of aortic calcification in postmenopausal women?
Baseline 18F-NaF uptake on PET/CT does not predict the progression of aortic calcification over a 4-year follow-up in postmenopausal women.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support 18F-NaF uptake for predicting aortic calcification progression in postmenopausal women; leaves open its prognostic role elsewhere.
Introduction Aortic calcification as detected by computed tomography is associated with arterial stiffening and is an important predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Uptake of 18 F-sodium fluoride ( 18 F-NaF) in the aortic wall reflects metabolically active areas of calcification. The aim of this study was to determine if 18 F-NaF uptake in the aorta is associated with calcification and progression of calcification as detected by computed tomography. Methods Twenty-one postmenopausal women (mean age 62 ± 6 years) underwent assessment of aortic 18 F-NaF uptake using positron emission tomography/computer tomography at baseline and a repeat computed tomography scan after a mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 1.3 years. Tracer uptake was quantified by calculating the target-to-background (TBR) ratios at baseline and follow-up. Calcification was assessed at baseline and follow-up using computed tomography. Results Over the follow-up period, aortic calcium volume increased from 0.46 ± 0.62 to 0.71 ± 0.93 cm 3 ( P < 0.05). However, the change in calcium volume did not correlate with baseline TBR either unadjusted ( r = 0.00, P = 1.00) or adjusted for age and baseline calcium volume (beta coefficient = −0.18, P = 0.42). TBR at baseline did not differ between participants with ( n = 16) compared to those without ( n = 5) progression in calcium volume (2.43 ± 0.46 vs. 2.31 ± 0.38, P = 0.58). In aortic segments identified to have the highest tracer uptake at baseline, calcium volume did not significantly change over the follow-up period ( P = 0.41). Conclusion In a cohort of postmenopausal women, 18 F-NaF uptake as measured by TBR in the lumbar aorta did not predict progression of aortic calcification as detected by computed tomography over a four-year follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cecelja et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Aortic calcification (n=21). Aortic 18 F-NaF tracer uptake was evaluated on Progression of aortic calcification (change in calcium volume) (beta coefficient -0.18, p=0.42). In postmenopausal women, baseline aortic 18 F-NaF uptake did not correlate with or predict the progression of aortic calcification over a 3.8-year follow-up (adjusted beta = -0.18, P=0.42).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: