Key result
Pioglitazone-induced changes in HDL-cholesterol, but not HbA1c, predicted the composite outcome of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke.
Why the study?
The separate contributions of glycaemic and lipid parameters to the reduced incidence of cardiovascular outcomes with pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetes with macrovascular disease were unclear.
Does pioglitazone reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease?
RCT (n=5,238)
randomized
Does pioglitazone reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease?
The cardiovascular benefits of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease appear to be driven by increases in HDL-cholesterol rather than improvements in HbA1c.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HDL-C response may guide pioglitazone use for CV risk reduction in high-risk T2D; confirms benefit independent of HbA1c.
AIM: In PROactive, pioglitazone reduced the incidence of death, myocardial infarction and stroke, and significantly improved HbA1c, systolic blood pressure (SBP), triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol relative to placebo. As these glycaemic and lipid parameters are major cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, we assessed their separate contribution to the reduced incidence of CV outcomes. METHODS: Patients (n = 5238) with type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease were randomized to 45 mg pioglitazone or placebo. Relationships among treatment, outcome (time to first event of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke) and 10 laboratory measurements and vital signs were investigated using log-linear models. Continuous variable measurements (percent changes from baseline to average of all postbaseline values prior to censoring) were made discrete by categorizing into tertiles. Log-linear models were fitted to multiway tables of discrete data and analysis of deviance used to summarize sources of variation in the data. RESULTS: Although pioglitazone treatment was associated with a decrease in HbA1c and an increase in HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), only the change from baseline HDL-C predicted the outcome (χ(2) = 28.89, p < 0.0001). No other variables, including HbA1c, triglycerides and systolic blood pressure, showed significant direct associations with outcome. When the analysis was extended to include baseline statin use, this was associated with an improved outcome independently of HDL-C changes. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis suggests that HDL-C, but probably not HbA1c, is a driver of pioglitazone's favourable influence on CV outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrannini et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease (n=5,238). pioglitazone vs. placebo was evaluated on time to first event of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke (p=< 0.0001). Pioglitazone-induced changes in HDL-cholesterol, but not HbA1c, predicted the composite outcome of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: