Key result
Combining PRISM and modified SHFM improves 1-year heart failure mortality prediction over either model alone.
Why the study?
The comparative performance of PRISM score and modified Seattle Heart Failure Model for one-year mortality prediction in heart failure patients and their combined utility for palliative care referral was unclear.
Does the combination of PRISM score and modified SHFM improve 1-year mortality prediction in heart failure patients compared to either model alone?
Observational (n=689)
Does the combination of PRISM score and modified SHFM improve 1-year mortality prediction in heart failure patients compared to either model alone?
Combining the PRISM score and modified SHFM improves 1-year mortality prediction in heart failure patients, which can help identify high-risk patients for palliative care consultation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve 1-year HF mortality prediction in cohorts; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
INTRODUCTION: We sought to assess one-year mortality in heart failure (HF) patients by using (Placement Resource Indicator for Systems Management) PRISM, a disease nonspecific risk stratification score, and use it along with modified Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) to guide patient selection for palliative care consultation. METHODS: A retrospective study design was used to examine 1-year mortality in 689 HF patients admitted from 2012 to 2014. One-year mortality was calculated using Pmort30/PRISM and modified SHFM scores, and the predicted scores were validated using the area under the ROC curve. CART was used to develop an algorithm to classify patients based on their mortality risk. RESULTS: The discriminatory ability of PRISM categorical score (AUC = 0.701) was not significantly different than the discriminatory ability of modified SHFM (AUC = 0.686) (DeLong's test p = 0.56) but improved significantly with the combination of PRISM (categorical) score + modified SHFM (AUC = 0.740) (p = 0.002). The predictive capability of the CART tree model after cross-validation was 72.2% (AUC 0.631). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests PRISM score performed as well as modified SHFM for one-year mortality prediction. Moreover, the addition of modified SHFM to PRISM score increases discriminatory ability in predicting 1-year mortality in heart failure patients compared to either of the two models alone. Together, when combined in a CART model, they can be used to identify the population subset with the highest mortality risk and hence guide goals of care discussion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Avula et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=689). PRISM score combined with modified Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) vs. PRISM score or modified SHFM alone was evaluated on 1-year mortality prediction (discriminatory ability measured by AUC) (p=0.002). Combining the PRISM score and modified SHFM significantly improved discriminatory ability for 1-year mortality in heart failure patients (AUC 0.740) compared to either model alone (P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: