Key result
In-hospital exercise for AHF improves physical function and quality of life, though robust evidence is lacking.
Why the study?
There is no consensus on exercise prescription for patients hospitalized with acute heart failure undergoing clinical stabilization despite known benefits in chronic stable heart failure.
Does aerobic and resistance exercise training improve physical function and quality of life in hospitalized adults with acute heart failure?
Does aerobic and resistance exercise training improve physical function and quality of life in hospitalized adults with acute heart failure?
Aerobic and resistance exercise programs in hospitalized acute heart failure patients show potential benefits in physical function and quality of life, but more robust studies are needed to establish specific exercise prescriptions.
May inform early exercise in acute HF stabilization; leaves open optimal protocols and safety in prospective trials.
Exercise performance is an essential tool for managing heart failure. Although the benefits of exercise are well documented for people with chronic and stable heart failure, there is still no consensus on their prescription in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure undergoing clinical stabilization. The aim of this study is to identify the literature on exercise programs encompassing the components of aerobic and resistance training for hospitalized patients admitted for acute heart failure. A scoping review was conducted according to the proposed methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Studies with adults over 18 years old, hospitalized, and diagnosed with acute heart failure who participated in aerobic and resistance exercise training programs during their hospital stay were included. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. One was a retrospective, observational analytical cohort study, in which the main outcome of the exercise program was improvement in the previous disabilities of the participants. The other two were multicenter randomized controlled studies that showed greater improvement in physical function, functional capacity, depression, quality of life, and frailty status in the intervention groups. The exercise prescriptions differed according to the principles of the exercise prescription-frequency of exercise, intensity of exercise, exercise time (duration), type (mode), exercise volume, and progression. It is too early to make recommendations based on evidence of the type structure of an exercise program with aerobic and strength-training components in this population. However, in the exercise programs of the reviewed studies, the predominance of light to moderate intensity and the importance of progressively increase the frequency and duration of the training sessions were demonstrated, with bicycle ergometers and walking being the most common types of aerobic exercises. It is recommended that investment and research in this area should continue with more methodologically robust studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lopes et al. (2023) conducted a review in acute heart failure. Aerobic and resistance exercise was evaluated. Aerobic and resistance exercise programs during hospitalization for acute heart failure improved physical function and quality of life across 3 included studies, though robust evidence is lacking.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: