Key result
Elastography strain ratio ≥6.8 is linked to ~15-fold greater odds of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Why the study?
The efficacy of the elastography strain ratio (ESR) as a predictor of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer in targeted prostate biopsy was investigated.
Does the elastography strain ratio improve the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients undergoing MRI-targeted biopsy?
Cohort (n=257)
No
Does the elastography strain ratio improve the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients undergoing MRI-targeted biopsy?
Odds Ratio: 15.14 (95% CI 2.859–126.339)
p-value: p=0.031
The elastography strain ratio using transrectal ultrasonography significantly improves the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer during MRI-targeted biopsy.
ESR may aid PCa prediction on targeted biopsy; leaves open its clinical utility pending prospective validation.
This study investigated the efficacy of the elastography strain ratio (ESR) as a predictor of prostate cancer (PCa) in targeted prostate biopsy. In total, 257 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy were enrolled. Before biopsy, we placed regions of interest (zone A and B) in the lesion and levator ani. The ESR was measured as zone A/zone B. Multivariate analyses were performed to predict PCa and clinically significant PCa. There were 206 (71.5%) positive cancer lesions. No difference in digit rectal examination findings was found between patients with and without PCa. For predicting clinically significant PCa, an ESR ≥ 6.8 was significantly higher in the PCa (+) group than in the PCa (-) group (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the conventional variables (model 1) plus the ESR was 0.845, which was significantly higher than that for model 1 (p = 0.001). In prostate imaging reporting and data system score 3 lesions, an ESR ≥ 4.6 was a significant predictor of PCa (p = 0.002). The AUC in model 1 plus the ESR was 0.856, which was significantly higher than that in model 1 alone (p = 0.017). The ESR is useful for predicting clinically significant PCa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoo et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Suspected prostate cancer (n=257). Elastography strain ratio (ESR) vs. Conventional clinical variables was evaluated on Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer (OR 15.14, 95% CI 2.859-126.339, p=0.031). An elastography strain ratio ≥ 6.8 was a significant independent predictor of clinically significant prostate cancer (OR 15.14) and improved diagnostic accuracy when added to conventional variables.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: