Key result
Somatic but not cognitive depressive symptoms are linked to ~7% higher HOMA-IR per unit.
Why the study?
The associations of depressive symptoms with insulin resistance, specifically separating somatic and cognitive symptoms, were not well characterized.
Are somatic and cognitive depressive symptoms differentially associated with insulin resistance in individuals referred for exercise stress testing?
Cross-Sectional (n=328)
Are somatic and cognitive depressive symptoms differentially associated with insulin resistance in individuals referred for exercise stress testing?
Effect estimate: 1.07 change (95% CI 1.002, 1.14)
Somatic depressive symptoms are more strongly associated with insulin resistance than cognitive depressive symptoms in patients referred for exercise stress testing.
Somatic symptoms associate with insulin resistance in referred patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
AIM: To examine the associations of depressive symptoms with insulin resistance, evaluating somatic and cognitive depressive symptoms separately. METHODS: A total of 328 individuals (mean age 60 years) referred for exercise stress testing, taking part in the Mechanisms and Outcomes of Silent Myocardial Ischemia study, completed the Beck Depression Inventory II. A fasting venous blood sample was collected for assessments of insulin and glucose level; the HOMA-IR (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance) was calculated. In principal component analysis, Beck Depression Inventory II items were forced to load onto two components (somatic and cognitive depressive symptoms). Adjusting for age, sex, BMI, medication use, smoking, physical activity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, general linear model analyses were conducted to examine the associations between the components and log HOMA-IR . RESULTS: Principal component analysis showed that nine items loaded onto a cognitive depressive symptoms component and 10 items loaded onto a somatic depressive symptoms component. When examined separately, both components were significantly associated with log HOMA-IR however, when including both components simultaneously in the model, only somatic depressive symptoms remained significantly associated with log HOMA-IR. Back-transformed, a one-unit change in somatic depressive symptoms was associated with a 1.07 (95% CI 1.002, 1.14) change in HOMA-IR and a one-unit change in cognitive depressive symptoms was associated with a 1.03 (95% CI 0.97, 1.14) change in HOMA-IR. CONCLUSION: Somatic depressive symptoms seem to be more strongly associated with insulin resistance than do cognitive depressive symptoms. Monitoring somatic depressive symptoms may be more appropriate than monitoring cognitive depressive symptoms among depressed individuals with high insulin resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Austin et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Depressive symptoms and insulin resistance (n=328). Somatic depressive symptoms vs. Cognitive depressive symptoms was evaluated on HOMA-IR (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance) (1.07 change, 95% CI 1.002, 1.14). A one-unit change in somatic depressive symptoms was significantly associated with a 1.07 change in HOMA-IR (95% CI 1.002-1.14), whereas cognitive depressive symptoms were not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: