Key result
Bosentan case report evaluates long-term efficacy in severe portopulmonary hypertension without quantitative results.
Why the study?
Portopulmonary hypertension is a subset of pulmonary arterial hypertension with limited data on long-term efficacy of bosentan treatment in severe cases.
Does bosentan improve long-term efficacy in patients with severe portopulmonary hypertension?
Case Report
Does bosentan improve long-term efficacy in patients with severe portopulmonary hypertension?
This review evaluates a case series on the long-term efficacy of bosentan for severe portopulmonary hypertension.
May support bosentan in portopulmonary hypertension; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Evaluation of: Hoeper MM, Halank M, Marx C et al. Bosentan therapy for portopulmonary hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 25(3), 502–508 (2005). Portopulmonary hypertension is defined as pulmonary arterial hypertension occurring in the presence of portal hypertension. It is classified as a subset of pulmonary arterial hypertension and accordingly it is defined hemodynamically. Portopulmonary hypertension shares the main pathologic features as well as diagnostic approach with other forms of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Several nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic approaches are currently available. Among the pharmacologic approaches prostacycline and its derivatives, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors such as sildenafil and endothelin receptor antagonists such as bosentan, have been used in portopulmonary hypertension treatment. This is a case series report on the long-term efficacy of bosentan treatment for severe (New York Heart Association functional Class III and IV) portopulmonary hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabina A Antoniu (2005) conducted a case report in Severe portopulmonary hypertension. Bosentan was evaluated on Long-term efficacy. Bosentan treatment was evaluated for long-term efficacy in severe portopulmonary hypertension, though no quantitative results were reported in the abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: