Key result
ePWV shows weak correlation and systematic bias versus measured cfPWV in older adults.
Why the study?
Few studies have directly compared estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) to measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), particularly in non-White older adults, and whether they correlate similarly with cardiovascular disease risk is unexplored.
Does estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) accurately agree with measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and associate similarly with CVD risk factors in older Black and White adults?
Observational (n=4,478)
Yes
Does estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) accurately agree with measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and associate similarly with CVD risk factors in older Black and White adults?
Estimated pulse wave velocity correlates weakly with measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in older Black and White adults, indicating it may not be a reliable surrogate measure for aortic stiffness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ePWV weakly correlates with cfPWV in older Black and White adults; leaves open its reliability as a surrogate for measured aortic stiffness.
Introduction: Aortic stiffness offers important insight into vascular aging and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The referent measure of aortic stiffness is carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). cfPWV can be estimated (ePWV) from age and mean arterial pressure. Few studies have directly compared the association of ePWV to measured cfPWV, particularly in non-White adults. Moreover, whether ePWV and cfPWV correlate similarly with CVD risk remains unexplored. Aim: (1) To estimate the strength of the agreement between ePWV and cfPWV in both Black and White older adults; and (2) to compare the associations of ePWV and cfPWV with CVD risk factors and determine whether these associations were consistent across races. Methods and Results: We evaluated 4478 [75.2 (SD 5.0) years] Black and White older adults in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. cfPWV was measured using an automated pulse waveform analyzer. ePWV was derived from an equation based on age and mean arterial pressure. Association and agreement between the two measurements were determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), standard error of estimate (SEE), and Bland-Altman analysis. Associations between traditional risk factors with ePWV and cfPWV were evaluated using linear mixed regression models. We observed weak correlations between ePWV and cfPWV within White adults (r = 0.36) and Black adults (r = 0.31). The mean bias for Bland-Altman analysis was low at -0.17 m/s (95%CI: -0.25 to -0.09). However, the inspection of the Bland-Altman plots indicated systematic bias (P < 0.001), which was consistent across race strata. The SEE, or typical absolute error, was 2.8 m/s suggesting high variability across measures. In models adjusted for sex, prevalent diabetes, the number of prevalent cardiovascular diseases, and medication count, both cfPWV and ePWV were positively associated with heart rate, triglycerides, and fasting glucose, and negatively associated with body mass index (BMI) and smoking status in White adults (P < 0.05). cfPWV and ePWV were not associated with heart rate, triglycerides, and fasting glucose in Black adults, while both measures were negatively associated with BMI in Black adults. Conclusions: Findings suggest a weak association between ePWV and cfPWV in older White and Black adults from ARIC. There were similar weak associations between CVD risk factors with ePWV and cfPWV in White adults with subtle differences in associations in Black adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyer et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Aortic stiffness (n=4,478). Estimated carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (ePWV) vs. Measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) was evaluated on Agreement between ePWV and cfPWV (mean bias -0.17, 95% CI -0.25 to -0.09, p=<0.001). Estimated and measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity showed weak correlation and systematic bias (mean bias -0.17 m/s; 95% CI -0.25 to -0.09; P<0.001) in older Black and White adults.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: