Key result
High neuroticism links to reduced SBP and MAP recovery in hostile but greater in friendly conditions.
Why the study?
The relationships between Neuroticism and cardiovascular and affective responses to cooperative social tasks were not well understood.
Does neuroticism affect cardiovascular and affective reactivity and recovery during a cooperative task in college undergraduate women?
Observational (n=87)
Does neuroticism affect cardiovascular and affective reactivity and recovery during a cooperative task in college undergraduate women?
Neuroticism influences cardiovascular recovery following social interactions, with hostile interactions impairing blood pressure recovery in highly neurotic individuals.
High neuroticism may blunt BP recovery after hostile interactions in young women; leaves open relevance to long-term CV risk or interventions.
This study examined the relationships between Neuroticism and cardiovascular and affective response to a cooperative laboratory task. Eighty-seven college undergraduate women scoring in the upper or lower tertiles on the NEO-FFI Neuroticism scale took part in a paired drawing task along with a laboratory confederate. The task had three conditions distinguished on the basis of on the confederate s interactive style: hostile, friendly, or ambiguous. SBP, DBP, MAP, and HR were measured at intervals during baseline, task, and recovery periods. Anger and anxiety were measured at baseline and during the task. Repeated-measures ANCOVA revealed that Neuroticism had an effect on affective reactivity, but not on cardiovascular reactivity. There were significant interactions between Neuroticism and condition, whereby the high-Neuroticism group showed less SBP and MAP recovery and greater anger reactivity in the hostile condition, and greater SBP and MAP recovery in the friendly condition. An ancillary mediational analysis revealed that the relationship between Neuroticism and anger reactivity was mediated by the participants perception of the confederate s level of hostility. These results suggest that in terms of cardiovascular factors, Neuroticism is most relevant in the period following hostile and friendly social interactions, rather than during the interaction itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James G. Hutchinson (2009) reported an observational. High Neuroticism vs. Low Neuroticism was evaluated on Cardiovascular (SBP, DBP, MAP, HR) and affective (anger, anxiety) reactivity and recovery. High Neuroticism was associated with less SBP and MAP recovery and greater anger reactivity in hostile conditions, and greater SBP and MAP recovery in friendly conditions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: